
I didn't post before this fight because I knew I'd written a prediction about it about two months ago. I didn't go back to read it before watching the fight to avoid polluting my scoring with that prediction. I'll excerpt my prediction here:
"Now...the big question is: will Calzaghe's workrate style pose a problem for Hopkins? Heck, yes! Now...I can't help but wonder if Hopkins sees something we don't because on paper this is not a good fight for him. It may simply be that there's no better fight left out there for Hopkins.... Has it enticed Hopkins in over his head? I think so. But then maybe at this stage and with his hall of fame credentials well in hand, Hopkins simply doesn't care.While Hopkins' style remains intact at his age, that's because it doesn't rely on quickness as much as it does guile and control of pace and position. Hopkins punches and ties up, he shoulders and butts and turns. All of this can be negated by an exceptionally accurate volume puncher with sound boxing skills. If there ever such a fighter, it's Joe Calzaghe. ... Calzaghe isn't just fighting a big fight. He's fighting for his legacy...to stay undefeated. He's fighting for a claim to a level of boxing immortality that Hopkins can no longer aspire to. He won't give up his "0" easily. He won't give it up without a fight. In the end, I don't think he'll give it up at all. Calzaghe by decision 116-112."
Well...except for that "flash knockdown" (Calzaghe's words) in the first round, the above could just as easily have been written about the fight afterward. In fact, on my card the knockdown making it a 10-8 Hopkins first round is the only thing standing between me and a perfect prediction (relative to my own card). I had it 116-111, exactly the same as Chuck Giampa the tie-breaking (at least in the order they were announced) ringside judge. That Adelaide Byrd scored the fight 114-113 for Hopkins (making it a split decision) is pretty unreal. I saw only four of the nine rounds that I gave Calzaghe as close rounds and three of those rounds would have had to be called for Hopkins to yield the result that judge Byrd came up with. Meanwhile, of the three that went Hopkins' way on my card, two were close with one of those being too close to call.
In other words, of six total close rounds, judge Byrd had to give five to Hopkins. That seems to be bias, plain and simple. Now...even if we assume that judge Byrd made the mistake of only watching Hopkins...wouldn't she still have seen Calzaghe hitting him with significantly greater frequency? I suppose the counterargument is that the more "significant shots" were landed by Hopkins, but that argument falls flat in the face of the full pursuit that Calzaghe had to implement to force Hopkins to fight. And whatever else it is, a boxing match is supposed to be a fight. The third judge had it for Joe 115-112, a score that is definitely well within reason.
Now...I found myself fighting my own prejudice against Hopkins' single counterpunch and hug style and I had to do it over Max Kellerman's constant genuflecting before the genius of Hopkins' sage "energy conserving" style. Kellerman is generally an astute commentator, but he missed the mark badly in this tilt. He seems to see Hopkins as a throwback fighter whose style makes him special. While there is truth to that, Hopkins has deteriorated into a one-trick pony. It's a good trick, but it's so ugly and boring that I simply hate to watch it. Crouch behind the left shoulder in a wide stance and wait and back away and circle away from the opponents power hand until they become frustrated and try to fight. Then jump in with a single straight punch and whether hitting or missing, clinch. In the clinch, bull your head and pin the other fighters arm on the off-referee side, turn the fighter away, punch in the kidney, body or side or back of the head, let go and push off. Complain liberally about getting hit on the break or rabbit punching or low blows. Hitting on the break is a bonus. Repeat.
It's so boring as to be stupefying and it forces me to root for the other guy. Calzaghe wanted to fight. He had to chase Hopkins to make him fight. All of that can be forgiven, however. That's fighting and in the immortal words of Ricky Hatton, "this ain't a tickling match, now is it?"What cannot be forgiven is the gentlemanly way that the ungentlemanly Hopkins is treated by HBO and Kellerman himself. Avoiding controversy, Kellerman danced around Hopkins' tenth round fakery rather than confronting him with it. Hopkins used a glancing glove-sided blow just below the beltline to take a four minute break. This was more than just an old man taking a break from being outpointed (which it was, too), but it was Hopkins' trying to lay late groundwork for a point deduction that he didn't deserve. In that vein, I'm surprised to find myself thankful for the almost completely otherwise ineffectual "I'm firm, but I'm fair" referee Jose Cortez. He never took a point from Hopkins when he should have, but at least he didn't take one from Calzaghe when he shouldn't have.
This was a subpar performance for the HBO team. There was apparently no amount of punching on the break, head butting, shoving, arm-pinning and hitting from behind that Hopkins could do to convince the reverent assembled group that he was anything other than "a physical specimen who, at age 43, remains a challenge for any fighter in the division and whose hall-of-fame credentials are as impeccable as his tough-to-solve masterful defensive fighting style." This guy is a dirty fighter who has cowed even the HBO team into bowing to him. While I've always disliked his style, I've respected him as a shrewd businessman and boxer who by sheer will managed to overcome the boringness (did I just make up a word?) of his boxing style. Now even that is erased. Some may say he tried to use the rules to buy himself some time, try to turn the tide and throw his opponent off-balance. Hogwash. I see a man who defiles the ring by pretending injury where there is none. Period. Shame on you Bernard. I hope you never return to the ring. I will not watch you again.
Who should Calzaghe fight next? He mentioned becoming a "giant killer" when asked if he would consider fighting Roy Jones. I would pay to see that (and it bears mention that I appreciated NOT having to pay for Calzaghe/Hopkins...something I anticipated having to do...), though I can't help but wonder why Calzaghe wants these old lions of the division. But of course the answer is obvious. That's the biggest name and the biggest fight. Roy showed he may still have some game against the thoroughly shot Trinidad, but he too will probably get smoked by Calzaghe. I wonder what catchweight they would use and I wonder if Joe might have a little more trouble with even the diminished Roy. Roy has a suspect chin, but Calzaghe probably won't be able to test it seriously and a bold Roy is a dangerous Roy. I'll have to think about that one before I can commit to a prediction. Until next time....
"Now...the big question is: will Calzaghe's workrate style pose a problem for Hopkins? Heck, yes! Now...I can't help but wonder if Hopkins sees something we don't because on paper this is not a good fight for him. It may simply be that there's no better fight left out there for Hopkins.... Has it enticed Hopkins in over his head? I think so. But then maybe at this stage and with his hall of fame credentials well in hand, Hopkins simply doesn't care.While Hopkins' style remains intact at his age, that's because it doesn't rely on quickness as much as it does guile and control of pace and position. Hopkins punches and ties up, he shoulders and butts and turns. All of this can be negated by an exceptionally accurate volume puncher with sound boxing skills. If there ever such a fighter, it's Joe Calzaghe. ... Calzaghe isn't just fighting a big fight. He's fighting for his legacy...to stay undefeated. He's fighting for a claim to a level of boxing immortality that Hopkins can no longer aspire to. He won't give up his "0" easily. He won't give it up without a fight. In the end, I don't think he'll give it up at all. Calzaghe by decision 116-112."
Well...except for that "flash knockdown" (Calzaghe's words) in the first round, the above could just as easily have been written about the fight afterward. In fact, on my card the knockdown making it a 10-8 Hopkins first round is the only thing standing between me and a perfect prediction (relative to my own card). I had it 116-111, exactly the same as Chuck Giampa the tie-breaking (at least in the order they were announced) ringside judge. That Adelaide Byrd scored the fight 114-113 for Hopkins (making it a split decision) is pretty unreal. I saw only four of the nine rounds that I gave Calzaghe as close rounds and three of those rounds would have had to be called for Hopkins to yield the result that judge Byrd came up with. Meanwhile, of the three that went Hopkins' way on my card, two were close with one of those being too close to call.
In other words, of six total close rounds, judge Byrd had to give five to Hopkins. That seems to be bias, plain and simple. Now...even if we assume that judge Byrd made the mistake of only watching Hopkins...wouldn't she still have seen Calzaghe hitting him with significantly greater frequency? I suppose the counterargument is that the more "significant shots" were landed by Hopkins, but that argument falls flat in the face of the full pursuit that Calzaghe had to implement to force Hopkins to fight. And whatever else it is, a boxing match is supposed to be a fight. The third judge had it for Joe 115-112, a score that is definitely well within reason.
Now...I found myself fighting my own prejudice against Hopkins' single counterpunch and hug style and I had to do it over Max Kellerman's constant genuflecting before the genius of Hopkins' sage "energy conserving" style. Kellerman is generally an astute commentator, but he missed the mark badly in this tilt. He seems to see Hopkins as a throwback fighter whose style makes him special. While there is truth to that, Hopkins has deteriorated into a one-trick pony. It's a good trick, but it's so ugly and boring that I simply hate to watch it. Crouch behind the left shoulder in a wide stance and wait and back away and circle away from the opponents power hand until they become frustrated and try to fight. Then jump in with a single straight punch and whether hitting or missing, clinch. In the clinch, bull your head and pin the other fighters arm on the off-referee side, turn the fighter away, punch in the kidney, body or side or back of the head, let go and push off. Complain liberally about getting hit on the break or rabbit punching or low blows. Hitting on the break is a bonus. Repeat.
It's so boring as to be stupefying and it forces me to root for the other guy. Calzaghe wanted to fight. He had to chase Hopkins to make him fight. All of that can be forgiven, however. That's fighting and in the immortal words of Ricky Hatton, "this ain't a tickling match, now is it?"What cannot be forgiven is the gentlemanly way that the ungentlemanly Hopkins is treated by HBO and Kellerman himself. Avoiding controversy, Kellerman danced around Hopkins' tenth round fakery rather than confronting him with it. Hopkins used a glancing glove-sided blow just below the beltline to take a four minute break. This was more than just an old man taking a break from being outpointed (which it was, too), but it was Hopkins' trying to lay late groundwork for a point deduction that he didn't deserve. In that vein, I'm surprised to find myself thankful for the almost completely otherwise ineffectual "I'm firm, but I'm fair" referee Jose Cortez. He never took a point from Hopkins when he should have, but at least he didn't take one from Calzaghe when he shouldn't have.
This was a subpar performance for the HBO team. There was apparently no amount of punching on the break, head butting, shoving, arm-pinning and hitting from behind that Hopkins could do to convince the reverent assembled group that he was anything other than "a physical specimen who, at age 43, remains a challenge for any fighter in the division and whose hall-of-fame credentials are as impeccable as his tough-to-solve masterful defensive fighting style." This guy is a dirty fighter who has cowed even the HBO team into bowing to him. While I've always disliked his style, I've respected him as a shrewd businessman and boxer who by sheer will managed to overcome the boringness (did I just make up a word?) of his boxing style. Now even that is erased. Some may say he tried to use the rules to buy himself some time, try to turn the tide and throw his opponent off-balance. Hogwash. I see a man who defiles the ring by pretending injury where there is none. Period. Shame on you Bernard. I hope you never return to the ring. I will not watch you again.
Who should Calzaghe fight next? He mentioned becoming a "giant killer" when asked if he would consider fighting Roy Jones. I would pay to see that (and it bears mention that I appreciated NOT having to pay for Calzaghe/Hopkins...something I anticipated having to do...), though I can't help but wonder why Calzaghe wants these old lions of the division. But of course the answer is obvious. That's the biggest name and the biggest fight. Roy showed he may still have some game against the thoroughly shot Trinidad, but he too will probably get smoked by Calzaghe. I wonder what catchweight they would use and I wonder if Joe might have a little more trouble with even the diminished Roy. Roy has a suspect chin, but Calzaghe probably won't be able to test it seriously and a bold Roy is a dangerous Roy. I'll have to think about that one before I can commit to a prediction. Until next time....



